Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4667 14
Original file (NR4667 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

  
   

    
 

a ey
Pi a
clit

 

BJG
Docket No: 4667-14

23 April 2014

From: Chairman, Board for Correction cof Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

jE

REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref: {a) Title 10 U.S.c. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 18 Jun 13 w/attachments
(2) HOMC MMSB/PERB memo dtd 31 Mar 14
(3) HOMC JAM2 memo dtd 2 Oct 13
(4) Subject’s naval record

i. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written
application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in
effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the
fitness report for 1 to 2 January 2013 (copy at Tab A to
enclosure (1)). As explained in enclosure (2), the Headquarters
Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board has
directed removal of the contested fitness report. He further
requested removal of the nonjudicial punishment (NJP) of 15
November 2012 (copy of Unit Punishment Book (UPB) entry at Tab B
to enclosure (1)). Finally, by implication, he requested
removal of two service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks
(1070)”) entries dated 15 November 2012 (copy at Tab C to
enclosure (1)).

2. The Board, consisting of Mses. Tollefson and Montgomery and
Mr. Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and
injustice on 22 April 2014, and pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:
a. Before applying to the Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies which were available under existing law
and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. In enclosure (3), the HQMC office with cognizance over
NJP’s has commented to the effect that Petitioner’s request to
remove it has merit and warrants corrective action. The
advisory opinion bases its rationale on the fact that the UPB is
not filled out properly.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of enclosure (3), the Board finds an error
warranting relief. In view of the above, the Board directs the
following corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by
removing the NJP of 15 November 2012.

b. That Petitioner’s record be further corrected by
removing the two service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks
(1070)") entries dated 15 November 2012 . This is to be
accomplished by physically removing the page 11 on which the
entries appear, or completely obliterating the entries so they
cannot be read, rather than merely lining through them.

c. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board’s recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner’s record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.

d. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner’s naval record.
4, Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BRIAN J. ax: om

Recorder Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

RS CE

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8518-13

    Original file (NR8518-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    2, The Board, consisting of Messrs. Boyd, Chapman and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 Maxch 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. c. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or material be added to the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 12640 12

    Original file (12640 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Clemmons, Gorenflo and Midboe, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 24 January 2013, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11(b) (“Administrative Remarks (1070) ") entry dated 5 August >010 and his undated rebuttal. d. That any material directed to be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07838-10

    Original file (07838-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    JAMS stated that the NUP “stemmed from [Petitioner’s] failure to report a civilian DUI arrest,” however, the UPB entry actually says he was punished “for failing to notify his command of his DUI conviction [emphasis added] .” JAM5 noted that “the requirement to report the conviction (rather than the arrest) is lawful.” d. Enclosure (4) explains that PERB directed removing the contested fitness report in light of enclosure (3). e. In enclosure (5), the Marine Corps Recruiting Command (MCRC)...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 04419-12

    Original file (04419-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 13 September 2012, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the following from the Supplemental Page of the UPB entry for the NJP of 1 July 2011: BLOCK 1 Art. The sentence, as corrected, will read as...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06982 12

    Original file (06982 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 2 March to 31 December 2007 (copy at Tab A) and the service record page 11(c) (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 28 June 2007 with his rebuttal dated 6 July 2007 (copies at Tab B). The Board, consisting of Ms. Zivnuska and Messrs. Mann...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06664-11

    Original file (06664-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Ms. Aldrich and Messrs. Pfeiffer and Spain, reviewed Pétitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 September 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 26 October 2010. That any material or entries inconsistent with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02803-07

    Original file (02803-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He further requested removal of the fitness report for 20 November 1998 to 31 March 1999 (copy at Tab C in enclosure (1)). d. In enclosure (3), Petitioner added his request to remove the page 11 entry dated 24 March 1999. e. In enclosure (4), the HQMC PERB commented to the effect that the contested fitness report should stand. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11d (“Administrative Remarks (1070) 7”) entry dated 24 March 1999.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 03944-12

    Original file (03944-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Ms. White-Olson and Messrs. Gattis and Silberman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 August 2012, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 11 February 9011. c. That any material or entries inconsistent...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5272 14

    Original file (NR5272 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 November 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. e. In enclosure (6), MIQ again commented to the effect that the contested entry dated 6 January 2012 should stand, but further commented to the effect that Petitioner’s request to remove the entries dated 14 December...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8328 14

    Original file (NR8328 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the NUP of 21 November 2011. b. That Petitioner's record be further corrected by “-. e. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board’s recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner’s record and that no such entries or material be added to the record in the future.